Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
Of theoretical interest: under the common law the owner of the underlying land also owns the air space above the land. Thus, we may have the owner shooting down a trespasser! Just thought I'd have some fun.
12 posted on 02/17/2012 4:31:31 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

I would hope so but if you can’t shoot a spy-drone over your property with a gun— I would purchase the most uber billy bad-a** power washer available... OOPS!


13 posted on 02/17/2012 4:44:15 PM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
It's not really theoretical. Way back when USSC ruled that the federal government could regulate the otherwise unused airspace above your property to allow military and commercial aircraft.

That way you couldn't run out and sue them for trespassing in your space (which you still own ~ like if you stuck a mountain there you'd get it all back eh).

At the same time the federales only get to regulate that airspace if they do, in fact, regulate it.

There have to be some rules around about these little unmanned aircraft ~ and the crowd flying it probably didn't bother finding them.

I'd say that it was just another UFO shot down out in the woods.

17 posted on 02/17/2012 5:28:48 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson