To: Texan5
Thank you-so the teacher’s pet is not a child. Correct, however the teacher committed a crime because she was in a position of authority over the student in a public institution, using authority to coerce sex, sexual assault, not statutory rape.
40 posted on
02/17/2012 11:44:45 AM PST by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
To: Navy Patriot
I agree-I said in another post that it is like a supervisor bullying a worker in that manner-using a position of authority to coerce an individual into having sex. A nasty thing to be sure, but not statutory rape or sex with a child. Whether supervisor or teacher, such a thing should be a matter of record for any future potential employer to see.
56 posted on
02/17/2012 12:21:37 PM PST by
Texan5
("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
To: Navy Patriot
“...because she was in a position of authority over the student in a public institution, using authority to coerce sex,...
Oh horsecrap.
How do you know she coerced him?
This should be a firing offense, nothing more.
58 posted on
02/17/2012 12:25:45 PM PST by
Nik Naym
(It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
To: Navy Patriot
Correct, however the teacher committed a crime because she was in a position of authority over the student in a public institution, using authority to coerce sex, sexual assault, not statutory rape.Sort of like the relationship between an employer and an intern, right?
77 posted on
02/17/2012 4:01:42 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Limbaugh: Tim Tebow miracle: "He had atheists praying to God that he would lose.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson