Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VinL

There’s a misleading headline based on a misinterpretation of a word. Sarah doesn’t think Santorum is a “threat” to Romney, he’s a competitor. She rejected the word “threat”, because it denotes combat, and she’s said she doesn’t think our candidates should be tearing each other down.

She may have sounded too nice about Romney for many, but beyond that, we now know she is allowed to endorse, and won’t, that she thinks all our candidates are good, whatever that means, and that none of them have laid out a good plan yet, so she wants the competition to continue until they do.


88 posted on 02/12/2012 5:26:45 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Sarah doesn’t think Santorum is a “threat” to Romney, he’s a competitor. She rejected the word “threat”, because it denotes combat, and she’s said she doesn’t think our candidates should be tearing each other down.
******************
Oh! Thanks for explaining that Charley. As you know, I just post, you decide. -:)


108 posted on 02/12/2012 5:56:32 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson