NOTE!
This refers to prior cases, NOT the current Obama case.
The title is misleading?...why?...as it relates to this judge’s past history, it is spot on...rules are you don’t change the title of an article...check the date before you read...just sayin’
NOTE!
This refers to prior cases, NOT the current Obama case.
The source is a press release from the Georgia Sec. of State (and its title doesn’t relate well to the point the OP is trying to make)...
“Secretary Cox Rules to Keep Randy Sauder on Ballot in State House District 29 Race”
Since most articles posted on the “Latest Articles” page are current, the moderator may wish to add “(in 2000)” to the title the OP made up, as a clarification.