Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Obama eligible to be Georgia candidate
birther-report ^ | February 3, 2012 | birth report

Posted on 02/03/2012 4:45:34 PM PST by satan69

Judge: Obama eligible to be Georgia candidate

A state administrative law judge on Friday flatly rejected challenges seeking to keep President Barack Obama from being a candidate in next month's Georgia primary.

In a 10-page order, Judge Michael Malihi dismissed one challenge that contended Obama has maintained a Hawaiian birth certificate that is a computer-generated forgery, has a fraudulent Social Security number and invalid U.S. identification papers. He also turned back another that claimed the president is not a natural born citizen.

Last month, Malihi heard testimony and took evidence in a hearing boycotted by Obama's lawyer.

With regard to the challenge that Obama does not have legitimate birth and identification documents, Malihi said he found the testimony presented by lawyers of the so-called "birther" movement and their evidence "to be of little, if any, probative value and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs' allegations."

A number of the witnesses who testified about the alleged fraud were never qualified as experts in birth records, forged documents and document manipulation, Malihi wrote. "None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony," he wrote.

MORE HERE: http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/judge-obama-eligible-to-1330300.html

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: certifigate; court; ga; georgia; judge; malihi; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: trumandogz

“natural born citizen” has nothing to do with the location of one’s birth. You’re real close, at least you didn’t bring up the Lamaze birth.


41 posted on 02/03/2012 7:32:03 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the Current Quarter Expenses.


Donate to Free Republic!

42 posted on 02/03/2012 8:11:21 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: azishot; LucyT; onyx; TheOldLady; Las Vegas Ron
About time he was banned! He should have been banned when he said this back in 2010. Eaker had called him out then and Eaker and others were spot on:
”I’m not quite sure America has paid for the “mistake” of slavery,” posted by trumandogz… whatcha want Trumandogz? Reparations?

43 posted on 02/03/2012 8:41:31 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

He’s been a thorn in our butts for a long time. There are still quite a few out there but that’s for another day.


44 posted on 02/03/2012 8:56:32 PM PST by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: satan69
I am a realist. Obviously, our entire political system, the courts, the conservative and Marxist media, law enforcement, and our highest military are utterly corrupt. An oath means nothing to them. Millions of our citizens are willing to vote for a Marxist with a completely unknown history.

So...The thing to do is prepare for when the SHTF, because it is inevitably coming. The only glue that has held our nation's experiment in self-rule together is the basic morality, honesty, and good will of the citizenry. That glue is no longer there.

45 posted on 02/03/2012 9:05:20 PM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

Of course it makes him happy, but probably not as happy as his ZOT makes me. :P


46 posted on 02/03/2012 9:30:03 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Ok let’s say for the sake of arguement the birth certificate is “real” check. And the several experts say it was fake are wrong..check. And the girl who ran the SS# and found it was issued to someone in 1890 was inept...check. All facts were inconclusive to make a judgement or whatever...check. HOW does the judge explain that in Obamas on book “Dreams of my Father” said his dad was Kenyan when that means he could be a natural born citizen if both parents are not US citizens. I looked it up and they pitched a fit about McCain and had him turn over his info cause he was born in Panama however his dad was in service stationed there and both parents were US citizens. One more question..does this now mean that if I am subpeoned to court I can blow them off and not show up??? Obama is not who he says he is or he would not have spent millions to cover it up, if he couldn’t be in court (not) he would have gotten documents and sent his attorney. He didn’t show up didn’t send attorney and was In contempt of court but judge says he won’t file contempt of court. Obama needs GA votes to win again.. looks llike he has shown once again “I AM ABOVE THE LAW”


47 posted on 02/03/2012 9:30:28 PM PST by sharc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Which is rather curious since no legal proof has been presented to the courts to prove that Obama was born in the U.S.


48 posted on 02/03/2012 11:09:23 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

The assistant vice-chancellor in New York ignored Supreme Court precedent from Inglis v. Sailor’s Snug Harbour that disproved his belief. There’s a reason why this case is NOT quoted as precedence.


49 posted on 02/03/2012 11:11:33 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

actually, the ruling was that the judge didn’t see the evidence as being compelling. of course, this doesn’t mean that the defense, which never showed up, carried their burden of proof... proof that the candidate was eligible

unless the defendant WAS represented... by the judge

this ruling does not state how he is eligible to be on the ballot


50 posted on 02/03/2012 11:26:09 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe; little jeremiah; bushpilot1

The under the radar lib dogz left the building. See above.


51 posted on 02/03/2012 11:57:46 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Talisker; hoosiermama; butterdezillion; LucyT; Danae
Stop gasping for breath, people. Think it through - no matter who won at this level, it would be appealed.

Knowing that, the judge simply did not want to be the one who went against a sitting president, since he wouldn’t be the final rule anyway. So, he played it safe.

The significant thing that happened here was that by allowing the case to be heard, he gave it standing and let it into the system.

This will be decided by the USSC, or not at all.

Praying you're right.

I believe we're getting there, but there are a lot of switchbacks and hairpin curves as we ascend the mountain.

52 posted on 02/04/2012 12:18:54 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: satan69

obumpa


53 posted on 02/04/2012 3:15:47 AM PST by Dajjal ("I'm not concerned about the very poor." -- Mitt Rmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont; Talisker; hoosiermama; butterdezillion; LucyT; Danae; edge919; Red Steel

“Stop gasping for breath, people. Think it through - no matter who won at this level, it would be appealed.”


Maybe I am overly optimistic and looking at this as the “glass half full”. But perhaps Malahi has done the plaintiffs a favor in this ruling? If he had judged this in favor of the plaintiffs, it would only be a recommendation to the SOS and may not go anywhere after that. Or even if the SOS did rule against Obama, he could just give up on Georgia and move along since Georgia is a red state anyway.

With this outcome, the plaintiffs now have the opportunity to continue the appeals process to a higher court. Isn’t it in their best interest for this to be appealed all the way to SCOTUS??


54 posted on 02/04/2012 4:03:43 AM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Photobucket
55 posted on 02/04/2012 4:18:22 AM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: satan69
‎" There has never been a law on the books created by the Congress, which made it illegal for a common man to practice law. Every Judge of a District, Circuit or Appeal Court, except Justices and Magistrates, is a lawyer and a member of the Bar. These Judges have the authority to establish local rules of court and those mentioned, have created a local rule that prevents common people from representing any other person in their court or ‘to practice law without a license!’ A license requires that you produce your Bar Association number. For those who don’t know, the Bar Association is simply a ‘Lawyers Union,’ and when lawyers are accepted into the Bar, they are required to swear allegiance to a foreign power! The American Bar Association is a branch of a national organization titled; “The National Lawyers Guild Communist Party” and can be found recorded in the United States *Code at: [28 U. S. C. 3002, section 15a].* They have become so big and entrenched that they no longer fear reprisal! " http://www.law.cornell.edu/​uscode/​usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.htm​l (15) “United States” means— ______(A) a Federal corporation; - - - - - - - http://www.in5d.com/anonymous-judge-blows-the-whistle.html
56 posted on 02/04/2012 4:45:39 AM PST by SF_Redux (Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
There is no difference between a Citizen at birth and a Natural Born Citizen.

There might have been, in the past, but times have changed.

Common Law is trumped by legislation.

The Constitutional “Natural Born Citizen” language has remained valid, of course, but the definition of that term can and has been changed by Congress.

It has always been true that a Natural Born Citizen was a Citizen from the moment of birth. That was harder to achieve under Common Law rules, but those rules no longer control the matter.

57 posted on 02/04/2012 5:19:21 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux

John F. Kennedy hints at the threat of secret societies. He is talking about communism, but he is ALSO talking about the secret societies that run America behind the scenes. He is speaking out against the very people that assassinated him.

JFK was the first president to effectively use television to speak directly to the American people. No other president had conducted live televised press conferences without delay or editing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnQntSgLkAo


58 posted on 02/04/2012 5:26:42 AM PST by SF_Redux (Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Looks like he DID get tossed...

When did that happen?


59 posted on 02/04/2012 6:08:59 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
zero’s thugs and threats got to him!

I doubt that. Anybody who believed, even for a second, that any judge in any courtroom in this country was going to embrace any of this this birther nonsense is an idiot.

60 posted on 02/04/2012 6:11:09 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson