To: steve8714
I dont see much difference from Newt to Mitt.
Let's start with abortion:
Do you as a conservative pick:
a.) The politician who both while in office and out of office has always been pro-life?
b.) The politician who, with the exception to the run-up to the 2008 and 2012 POTUS nominations has been hard left-wing in his support of abortion, including providing for easy access to $50 abortions in his Health Care plan that he still supports?
1 guess as to which one is a.) and which one is b.)
To: SoConPubbie
Better, but let me ask; are you a single-issue voter? If so, you can count on the party to disappoint again. Santorum has been a practicing, faithful Catholic much longer than Xavier-come-lately Newt and has pro-life credentials at least as good. Gingrich’s only advantage is two friends who will bankroll a super PAC. That’s a game at which Mitt is better. Mitt’s primary campaign, and Mitt’s are modeled after Clinton in 1992; act like the presumptive nominee and some folks will treat you as such.
23 posted on
01/31/2012 7:48:29 PM PST by
steve8714
(Hitchens was wrong.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson