Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: O6ret
You’re focusing on the wrong point...

I disagree, though I do understand that I'm focusing on a different point than you are.

Attempting to leave when told not to just aggravated the situation. I don’t know if use of the Tazer was warranted but if he refused an order to stop three times as reported could be the Ranger felt she had no other option.

Again, there is a time limit beyond which an order to stop is no longer lawful. I don't know what the limit is, but I do know that it is illegal for an officer to detain you indefinitely.

I also know that an officer is legally obligated to respond to the direct questions "Am I being arrested?" or "Am I being detained?". The officer does not have the freedom to not respond to these questions.

I am not certain that the information presented in this thread is complete or fully accurate. However, based on what I've read, it doesn't seem that either side was fully in the right.

103 posted on 02/01/2012 8:30:58 AM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Oberon

Either side doesn’t have to be “fully in the right”. That still doesn’t give the dog walker the right to leave when told to stay.

Giving a police officer a fictitious name is a felony in some jurisdictions. So is refusing to stop when asked to.


107 posted on 02/01/2012 11:42:11 AM PST by O6ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson