Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Theoria

One tiny little point: they weren’t “indigenous” when they got here and replaced the indigenous population.


12 posted on 01/27/2012 8:52:12 AM PST by SuzyQue (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SuzyQue

There is growing evidence that there were “indigenous” peoples here who decended from the european Solutrian migration from the end of the last ice age (30-50K years ago). The Siberian immigrants overtook the fewer decendents of the early migration and in some cases intermarried but they pushed out the existing population that preceded them nonetheless. That is exactly the reason why they demand that any studies of remains earlier than 15K years ago be squashed. They were the real first invaders.


15 posted on 01/27/2012 9:06:41 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SuzyQue

Indeed—They should more appropriately be referred to as Native Russians, or something like that.


17 posted on 01/27/2012 9:18:51 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Journalists first; then lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SuzyQue

They didn’t replace the indigeous population. Else their descendants wouldn’t have the X-Factor gene sequence.


92 posted on 01/30/2012 3:07:38 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson