Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

I’m not an evolutionist. I don’t think it is simple.

It is easier to evolve a non-living object that has a practical use than a living object whether it be cellular, plant or animal?

If that which is alive is defined as being capable of metabolism, growth, reproduction, irritability, adaption and movement then where does evolution get its beginning? There are simply too many things to have occurred by accident to account for any living thing.


28 posted on 01/18/2012 7:01:07 AM PST by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: killermosquito

Let’s look at the other side of the question. Why didn’t God create machines that can “live” on places like the Moon or other places in the Solar System where we don’t see life?


30 posted on 01/18/2012 7:28:26 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson