Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenKenobi
I think it is merely a tactical point of difference here. Obviously we are trying to get to the same place.

That is, denying Romney the nomination of the party, just as we now know how disastrous it was to get McCain nominated four years ago and the stuffing beat out of us as a result, because there was not a clear enough distinction between him and Obama, and I think at the end, finally, like Dole (1996) and Bush Sr. (1992), he just did not want to win, I mean really truly want to win. His only true saving grace was Sarah Palin on the ticket.

89 posted on 01/15/2012 10:11:47 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Obama Re-elected? Oh well. It's been fun. Take care. See you in the CAMPS....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanInTokyo

Speaking of which, more effective than a Cain endorsement of Newt, would be a Cain/Palin endorsement of Newt.


90 posted on 01/15/2012 10:19:32 PM PST by C210N (Dems: "We must tax you so that we can buy your votes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanInTokyo

You want to save Cain some face. I understand that. Me, I want to know where he stands. I’d rather he endorsed Romney so that we knew rather then convince him to act otherwise.


94 posted on 01/15/2012 10:33:15 PM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson