Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
Nevertheless, we believe that so many evidences have been collected by serious Scientists up to now, that the reality of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions may be soon acknowledged by the whole scientific community, opening the way towards the fully exploration of their potential for practical applications and long term sustainability of this, practically infinite, energy source.

The author cites quantity, but the problem is a lack of quality. The "many evidences" lack consistency and predictability that would imply a workable underlying theory.

The article starts off with a mention of catalyzed muon fusion, which is real and scientifically accepted. It was explained theoretically within a year of its observation with technology from over 50 years ago. Compare that with the wheel spinning and fraud that surrounds modern cold fusion.

22 posted on 01/09/2012 2:06:17 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
"The article starts off with a mention of catalyzed muon fusion, which is real and scientifically accepted. It was explained theoretically within a year of its observation with technology from over 50 years ago. Compare that with the wheel spinning and fraud that surrounds modern cold fusion."

There has been only ONE proven instance of fraud in cold fusion research. "If" Rossi is shown to be fraudulent, he will be #2.

23 posted on 01/09/2012 3:14:47 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

“The author cites quantity, but the problem is a lack of quality. The “many evidences” lack consistency and predictability that would imply a workable underlying theory.”

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ViolanteVproceeding.pdf

Quote from the above:

“It can no longer be asserted rationally that there no heat effect in any of the very large number of experiments reported here and elsewhere [5], or that the effect is the
result of (unknown) energy storage or (unseen) chemistry. Also, at this point, any claim that the Fleischmann-Pons Effect is “irreproducible” is not only unsound, it is unscientific. Where and when we are capable of reproducing all parameters critical to the effect, we reproduce the
effect.”

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ViolanteVproceedinga.pdf

You are ignorant. Educate yourself.


24 posted on 01/09/2012 3:57:39 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson