The author cites quantity, but the problem is a lack of quality. The "many evidences" lack consistency and predictability that would imply a workable underlying theory.
The article starts off with a mention of catalyzed muon fusion, which is real and scientifically accepted. It was explained theoretically within a year of its observation with technology from over 50 years ago. Compare that with the wheel spinning and fraud that surrounds modern cold fusion.
There has been only ONE proven instance of fraud in cold fusion research. "If" Rossi is shown to be fraudulent, he will be #2.
“The author cites quantity, but the problem is a lack of quality. The “many evidences” lack consistency and predictability that would imply a workable underlying theory.”
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ViolanteVproceeding.pdf
Quote from the above:
“It can no longer be asserted rationally that there no heat effect in any of the very large number of experiments reported here and elsewhere [5], or that the effect is the
result of (unknown) energy storage or (unseen) chemistry. Also, at this point, any claim that the Fleischmann-Pons Effect is irreproducible is not only unsound, it is unscientific. Where and when we are capable of reproducing all parameters critical to the effect, we reproduce the
effect.”
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ViolanteVproceedinga.pdf
You are ignorant. Educate yourself.