Kelly Clarkson gets into extended Twitter war over endorsement of Ron Paul

EW.com ^

[albie]

Who cares what she thinks? Although it does remind me of my 28 year old niece once saying...”Sheryl Crow says not to drink from water bottles left out in the sun. It causes cancer”. I said...”oh. Who do you listen to for dental advise, Bon Jovi?”...ba doom chee

[ColdOne]

Why they need the urge to even be political, or think we care.

[Allegra]

+1

[montag813]

Her responses also show how much she is in the tank for “gay” and “LGBT rights”. She won’t get a penny from my family to promote that crap.

[lazypadawan]

I saw some of it this morning. I don’t support Ron Paul nor do I care for the If You’re Not With Me, You’re A RINO Statist blather of Paul’s True Believers. That said, I couldn’t help but see that Clarkson was flamed by Twitter’s Obama Brownshirt/electronic mob for daring not to bow before their false god. Face it, she would have gotten the same treatment from these people had she supported Romney, Bachmann, or Gingrich. It wouldn’t matter. Her real crime was not supporting Obama.

[circlecity]

"Actually, I think it is a step up when a hollywood celeb type goes for a Libertarian."

Probably, but business wise it makes no sense for any entertainer to be supporting political candidates in our hyper-partisan times. Why alienate half your audience? Granted, older washed up stars can add a few years to their faded careers by coming out for something liberal - a cause or candidate. It gets them some charity crumbs thrown their way by the socialist Hollywood establishment. So that's one instance where it makes sense, I guess.

[seanmerc]

That’s not Kelly Clarkson, but that’s OK.

[Paradox]

The drug addled hollwood and rock-n-roll crowd doesn't realize the difference between Libertarians and Liberals. They are easily confused and snowed.

Actually, many of them are relatively small government conservatives. I came from Libertarianism, as a former liberal.

[hosepipe]

[ A whole two weeks and your spamming for Nazi Apologist Ron Paul! ]

Better than spamming for nOOt or Willard..
There are many here that do that too..
nOOt just loves both Roosevelts and Wilson..
Willard’s been tricking democrats to vote for him for years..
Currently hes tricking republicans..

In the Donkey Rodeo Paul is just a clown..
Kelly Clarkson has no idea of these dynamics..
As do most so-called “conservatives”..

[Paradox]

Probably, but business wise it makes no sense for any entertainer to be supporting political candidates in our hyper-partisan times.M

Absolutely, I'd keep my mouth shut.

[John D]

. Her real crime was not supporting Obama.

What is the difference between the two? They both blame America for every problem in the world, both endorse OWS, both want to allow perverts in the military, both want to destroy our military, both are racists, both are anti-Israel.
About the only difference is that Obama realized the world is a better place without OBL. The surrender monkey feels we deprived OBL of his civil right to kill innocent Americans.

[SMGFan]

“My life Would Suck Without You” ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRM70Jw7F4M

[hout8475]

I believe that is actually Kelly Carlson.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_Carlson

[Jewbacca]

I certainly agree with you on Myth Romney.

I could gag and vote for Newt — he’s a beltway tool, but he has all the right enemies, and is, I believe, a fiscal conservative.

Certainly not my first choice, though, I agree.

[taildragger]

I have been saying for eon's Dr Kervorkian, oops I mean Dr Paul will go indy and draw all the anti war crowd and the make my pot legal crowd, many of which voted for Obama last time.

IMHO if Paul goes Indy, he gets the Stoners, Anti-War-er's and now the Hollywierders too.

He hurts Obama more if he goes Indy IMHO....

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

I don’t think she looks like that anymore, if she ever really did look like that......