Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Iron Munro

Its not because the rules are “not fair”. It’s because they were changed at the last minute.


71 posted on 12/27/2011 5:14:03 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine

There’s nothing in the brief about that.

he’s challenging the law.

IANAL but the case he cites, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-930.ZS.html ,
does seem to be in his favor.


77 posted on 12/27/2011 5:20:51 PM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: John Valentine

The rules are also unConstitutional due to equal protection before the law. It is fundamentally flawed to verify one candidates signatures while giving another a pass. It’s completely possible that Romney does not have 10k verifiable signaures either. The people of Virginia need too demand access to their chosen candidate. Let the people decide, not party hacks!!!


80 posted on 12/27/2011 5:23:30 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson