Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay
Well, if what you say is accurate then that is a different story because then there was an “intent to deceive” by the retailer. This would be no different than pulling a bait and switch, which of course is illegal.

If what you say is correct then the FTC would and should likely investigate. Either way though, I can pretty much guarantee that I will soon be seeing TV ads from law firms imploring me to call them (because the law firm really cares about me!) because I've been injured by BB.

64 posted on 12/27/2011 1:04:51 PM PST by Obadiah (If U don't believe you can win, then there is no point in getting out of bed at the end of the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Obadiah

Proof is always the hard thing, but as I said...

when you are rejecting orders for commonly available items, like a WII after a month of having the order, I am not buying for one iota that its a supply chain issue. This just doesn’t pass the smell test to me.

Combine that with they didn’t tell anyone they wouldn’t get their order until it was really too late for any more online orders for the holiday to come in.. sure as hell smells of intenional deception.


67 posted on 12/27/2011 1:30:59 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah

Investigations will happen depending on how much was contributed to the obama administration.

it is very clear crony captialism protects best buy if they donated.


69 posted on 12/27/2011 3:44:42 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson