To: AUJenn
... she has announced that she and her partner are having a baby.The partner is pregnant.
My first suggestion is to not be hateful or hostile towards her, the partner or the child in any way.
However, by making the announcement that they are having a baby, they have decided to not request acceptance any longer. They are demanding that you now approve of and endorse their behavioural choices.
By involving an innocent unborn child in their own behavioural choices, as well as pretending two women having sex together are the same as a man and his wife, they have made a conscious decision to demand that your children, your family and that you personally deal with a decision they made for themselves.
As a Christian, you might want to decide for yourself that you are willing to approve of and endorse behavioural choices others have made.
82 posted on
12/08/2011 1:32:01 PM PST by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: pyx
THEY are not having a baby, she has decided to deny this child a father. Perhaps what is needed is constitutional referenda outlawing anonymous sperm donation.
98 posted on
12/08/2011 2:00:16 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson