Replies

Hmm ~ obviously you've never worked in a large organization. We had women at work. I knew some of them for 30 to 40 years. DIDN'T TOUCH A ONE OF THEM, and if one of them needed a taxi ride home for an emergency, I'm sure I'd lent a dollar or two (in an office type collection) and not thought a thing about it, nor bothered discussing it at home.

And one more time, the ol'gal from Chicago was the FIRST BROKEN LINK ~ she's the one who lost a paternity suit. That may not sound significant to you, but Maurie Povich would know!

Actually, I was a loss prevention manager for the largest private employer in the world. Had to investigate many sexual harassment complaints. They were almost always 'he said, she said' so it came down to risk. Did I believe the accused put us at risk again or did I believe the accuser was going to put us at risk again.

You keep wanting to put this on the women and whether they had sex or not. I don't care. My problem is that Cain is a bad risk. He was accused at least twice, that is fact. Whether he did it or not doesn't matter. Add to that a 13 year relationship he had with another woman he met at work and hid it from his wife. He didn't learn anything from the first two accusations, he put himself into a situation where it could happen again. That is also fact because it is happening now. So Cain is either stupid, which disqualifies him from being President, or he is reckless, which also disqualifies him. He wants to be the most powerful man on Earth, you don't give that job to stupid or reckless people.

He was accused by women who were multiple accusers and losers. The Postmaster General, for example, is always added to the list of those charged in an EEOC case arising in USPS ~ ALWAYS ~ because he's in charge. Odds are NO ONE has ever been accused of more sex discrimination or sexual harassment than a PMG.

That does not make the PMG a serial harasser. Nor is Cain.

Besides, this is a campaign organized by David Axelrod.