[so_real]

I try not rate people based on my perception of the severity of their sins. It's a losing argument in the long run. My point is that Cain is the recipient of allegation, Gingrich is historically defined by fact. Is Gingrich more conservative than Cain? more successful in business? less of a career politician? more attractive to minority citizens? more opposed to amnesty for illegal residents? more likely to eliminate health care mandates? less of a climate change sucker? No ... no ... no ... no ... Gingrich is a skilled orator with a gift for slinging bias back on the heads of the media elites. That is his most attractive feature. I am a Tea Party type. I'd happily vote for Cain or Bachmann. I'd be willing to support Santorum. I'd even vote for Ron Paul. I'm flexible. But I wont jump from Cain to Gingrich in the face of all the positives that would be abandoned in doing so. Gingrich is not better for me. And after the success in 2010, I've no intention of letting the media pick my candidate for me now.

[wardaddy]

by all means if Cain is still around when your primary is on then vote for him

that is the primary season..one’s choice and time to express it

my tagline explains my progression

Bachmann ideologically would be my first pick

Of big names I also like DeMint but he enjoys being conservative kingmaker in the safe Senate seat