To: wardaddy
I try not rate people based on my perception of the severity of their sins. It's a losing argument in the long run. My point is that Cain is the recipient of allegation, Gingrich is historically defined by fact. Is Gingrich more conservative than Cain? more successful in business? less of a career politician? more attractive to minority citizens? more opposed to amnesty for illegal residents? more likely to eliminate health care mandates? less of a climate change sucker? No ... no ... no ... no ... Gingrich is a skilled orator with a gift for slinging bias back on the heads of the media elites. That is his most attractive feature. I am a Tea Party type. I'd happily vote for Cain or Bachmann. I'd be willing to support Santorum. I'd even vote for Ron Paul. I'm flexible. But I wont jump from Cain to Gingrich in the face of all the positives that would be abandoned in doing so. Gingrich is not better for me. And after the success in 2010, I've no intention of letting the media pick my candidate for me now.
219 posted on
12/01/2011 11:51:58 PM PST by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: so_real
by all means if Cain is still around when your primary is on then vote for him
that is the primary season..one’s choice and time to express it
my tagline explains my progression
Bachmann ideologically would be my first pick
Of big names I also like DeMint but he enjoys being conservative kingmaker in the safe Senate seat
220 posted on
12/02/2011 12:12:50 AM PST by
wardaddy
(Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson