The allegations against Cain are quite different.
If they have such dirt on Gingrich as has been accused of Cain...settlements, severance, quid pro quo, giving money to a mistress for years without telling wifey...all that and his notion that he did not recall at first even though it was proven he sure recalled in 2003 which caused him to change his tune pronto
sorry...not exactly the same
just for arguments sake if half the Cain stuff is true..in order of marital malfeasance I'd go Newt, Cain and Clinton in order of severity from least to worst with Newt a 1-2 and Cain a 3-5 and Clinton an 11
but don't fret, there is plenty to attack Newt over besides that comparison
and for some of it I don't have a defense and will concede....he has a long track record...a lot of good, some not so good and some I did not agree with at all
I am unaware of any politician I have ever agreed with all the time...not even Palin or Magnus or Helms etc....I even disagreed with Clarence Thomas once over cross lighting and Scalia a few times.
I have disagreed with Rush and Hannity and Savage a lot the past few weeks.
It happens.
I hate to break it to you but Cain is done and I am of the opinion it was self inflicted and not just over the women or the denials but some stumbles in debates and interviews too.