Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero

Against Obama, I would agree 100% any one of our 8 would be an improvement.

However in the GOP primaries we do not have Obama running. So we have a chance to nominate a real conservative candidate. And that would not be Mitt or Newt. Why prefer a flip-flopping politician like Newt who will say whatever is necessary to get paid by Freddie Mac or pharmaceutical industry? It is a case of political prostitution in my opinion.


21 posted on 12/01/2011 3:10:24 PM PST by federal__reserve (Newt has more political baggage than any others running. $1 Billion will exploit it mercilessly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: federal__reserve
Why prefer a flip-flopping politician like Newt who will say whatever is necessary to get paid by Freddie Mac or pharmaceutical industry?

I do not PREFER Newt....I will not vote for Newt in the primary....unless it is just Newt and Mittens....

at this point Cain who WAS my first choice has been given the whole high tech lynching and I will probably not vote for him in the primary unless things change considerably. my primary is in September, so by that time it is usually down to a very few....

my original first choice is NOT on the list...she should have remained governor until this election to help bolster her ‘gravitas’....she made a big mistake and knows it....but I would jump at the chance to back Sarah.

152 posted on 12/02/2011 4:18:11 AM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson