Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bushpilot1

What in the hell are you talking about?

US v Ward is a water issue (”Section 311(b)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act prohibits the discharge of oil into navigable waters”), involving international law. Not citizenship. Vattel’s name does not appear in the decision.

http://supreme.justia.com/us/448/242/case.html

You also said it was from Justice Daniel, who lived in the 1800s.

Put your beer down, sober up, and post when you can keep your thoughts semi-straight.


209 posted on 12/03/2011 7:51:10 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers; DiogenesLamp

Ms: Rogers: “No one gives a fuck about Vattel

Journals of the Continental Congress
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1785.

The first Question is settled by Vattel in the following Paragraph


221 posted on 12/04/2011 3:28:30 AM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson