Look, hot fusion goes on INSIDE THE SUN. What you actually see for the most part is the corona. According to Widom and Larsen the process that takes place there is actually the same as what you call Cold Fusion (but it's not quite cold. In fact, it's intensely hot. Still, the way it progresses follows the same pathways they propose for LENR processes that've successfully shown the production of excess heat).
This is why you have to read the Widom-Larson paper. Also, there's a physicist at Purdue University who is looking at the exact same process from a slightly different view point and he's found he can tackle it with reference to Bose-Einstein condensate theory.
BTW, that's what the guys DOING THE WORK say is going on.
Now I'm ot a physicist and don't pretend to be one, but if you want to claim you see HOT FUSION on the Sun you gots' to show us the paper that puts forth the theory behind that process. And that's because I just named three fellows who say what you see on the Sun is NOT Hot Fusion.
Seriously? You pretend you're an expert in any subject that comes up. Give me a break...
Look, hot fusion goes on INSIDE THE SUN. What you actually see for the most part is the corona. According to Widom and Larsen the process that takes place there is actually the same as what you call Cold Fusion (but it's not quite cold. In fact, it's intensely hot. Still, the way it progresses follows the same pathways they propose for LENR processes that've successfully shown the production of excess heat).
This is why you have to read the Widom-Larson paper. Also, there's a physicist at Purdue University who is looking at the exact same process from a slightly different view point and he's found he can tackle it with reference to Bose-Einstein condensate theory.
BTW, that's what the guys DOING THE WORK say is going on.
Now I'm ot a physicist and don't pretend to be one, but if you want to claim you see HOT FUSION on the Sun you gots' to show us the paper that puts forth the theory behind that process. And that's because I just named three fellows who say what you see on the Sun is NOT Hot Fusion.
I do not know why you would quibble over the fact that the sun (and all stars) are powered by hot fusion. But here is a good layman's explanation of what goes on in the sun. I've never before seen anyone question the reality of hot fusion.
Cold fusion is a different matter. The Pons-Fleischmann experiment could not be replicated; other attempts at cold fusion have been, at best, inconclusive. The field of cold fusion appears to follow the trajectory of a pathological science, in which supporting results are marginal, at best, initial interest is high, but falls off as results just don't happen.
Now I'm ot a physicist and don't pretend to be one, but if you want to claim you see HOT FUSION on the Sun you gots' to show us the paper that puts forth the theory behind that process. And that's because I just named three fellows who say what you see on the Sun is NOT Hot Fusion.
Because you said so, really?
Please stop using words you have no idea what they mean.
You sound like Oswald Bates:
First of all, we must internalize the flatulation of the matter by transmitting the effervescence to further segregate the crux of my venereal infection...