WHAT "vested interest"?? I certainly ain't gettin' paid by Rossi (or anybody else). My ONLY "vested interest" is in the scientific facts of the issue. And based on the data available, I simply disagree with you and the seagulls. The best available evidence shows that Rossi's gizmo is real and works. There is NO such evidence of the contrary position...none...zero....zip. The "other side" is basing their entire position on Rossi's "social record" of financial malfeasance, and extrapolating ANY evidence to the contrary back to that fundamental ASSUMPTION.
Your response to this guy’s post makes me ask you a final question as you talk about “evidence”.
Clearly there is plenty of historical evidence to distrust Rossi. Given his past and what’s he’s done. Being involved in prior cons. It is known, it is not debatable.
You would be an idiot NOT to consider such evidence when he is once again making a large scientific claim.
I would ask you where is your evidence that Rossi has changed? Point to the evidence. Don’t point to the machine. Don’t point to him paying any penalty, he just got caught. That’s not evidence of change. Point to some concrete evidence he has done that shows he ought to be trusted and a higher degree of skepticism is totally unwarranted. Show me your hard evidence Rossi would never pull another massive scam.