How about the Government stop providing food at schools, altogether, and let parents decide what their children can and cannot eat. I don’t think that the problem here is that the Government has decided not to provide chocolate milk in lunches, but that the Government is providing lunches, AT ALL.
Oh, also, on another note, while the Tahoma School District may be saying that sugar is a problem, it may also be a cost saving measure. The price of chocolate has gone up substantially ovewr the last year or two, and is projected to keep rising, as the trees in Africa are aging and not being replanted, as fewer farmers are farming it (it is done on small 1-10 acre family farms, as there’s no industrialized way to process the beans), as the politics in that region destabilize, and as the demand in China and other nations rises. Therefore, the price of chocolate milk may become substantially more costly that “regular” milk.
As a side note, stock up on chocolate if it’s one of your vices, you’ll save yourself some money.
Give the brats gruel!
We are the 2%!
Soy milk? Yuck!
Isn't there a section in the Ayn Rand's book, “Atlas Shrugged”, where some government busybody causes a huge famine because he orders the growing of soy instead of wheat?
What about lactose intolerant kids? They can only drink chocolate milk unless they take a dreaded pill.
Soy Milk?? I didn’t know soy even had udders.
...and the article uses the term “sugary drink” in the first line demonstrating media bias——again.
Has the gov banned ‘Apple-Betty’ yet? This was a school lunch treat back in the day.
The Current FReepathon Pays For The Current Quarters Expenses?
