Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: luckystarmom

Well, maybe after you have 1 high risk pregnancy and baby, the insurance won’t cover more pregnancies. I think it would be up to the insurance companies to decide.

Your a sick woman (I say that lightly). You believe that they should only pay for one cancer treatment? One heart attach? One broken leg? What a crackpot. No wonder you voted for Obama. You are EXACTLY like him.


60 posted on 11/08/2011 11:14:30 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

Be Nice!!!!


70 posted on 11/08/2011 11:59:24 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
Your a sick woman (I say that lightly). You believe that they should only pay for one cancer treatment? One heart attach? One broken leg? What a crackpot. No wonder you voted for Obama. You are EXACTLY like him.

Are you implying that people have the option to get cancer or have heart attacks? Or that no one has any control over getting pregnant? Because otherwise, your response makes no sense.

I personally don't have a problem with someone having as many children as they can support. If the Duggars wish to have 20 more children, that's fine. But considering the complications of the last pregnancy, I also wouldn't be outraged if the insurance company raised their rates with each pregnancy to offset the ever increasing risk of expensive complications.

75 posted on 11/08/2011 12:11:51 PM PST by Reese Hamm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson