That construction is tenuous, at best. You would need to apply that same inference to my Clinton reference, as well. My point is that the dual standard is evidence of a manipulative racism. We do not use that standard against white Clinton, but we do against black Thomas and Cain. Certainly, the facts against Clinton are much better documented. How else could we explain the difference in treatment?
Let’s see, the very fact that liberals make an accusation of a black conservative is evidence that he is innocent.
No, not going to go there.
However, I will agree that a liberal who exonerated Clinton has no business attacking anybody, whatever color, whatever political persuasion, for which there is no suspicion of anything less than that guy. But, I have the problem of being consistent.