Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
So says Rossi. We don’t have any actual evidence of this. All we have is Rossi’s claim, and his claim that his “secret company” was satisfied with the test. ***There were others there, like the author of this article. This is the first time I’ve caught you in a distortion. That’s unusual to find someone who can actually stick to the facts to a reasonable extent — until now, but I’ve lowered my standards for pathological skeptics.
Saying that everyone there must be part of the scam is like saying that everyone at a Three-Card Monte game must be part of the scam.

You've made this mistake several times before. Do you have any evidence that the rest of the attendees had more information about the "secret" company than the rest of us? Or are they relying on the same "evidence" as the rest of us: Rossi's unsubstantiated claims?

71 posted on 11/01/2011 4:22:53 AM PDT by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Johnny B.

Do you have any evidence that the rest of the attendees had more information about the “secret” company than the rest of us?
***Yes. Rossi said that the customer reps could not be photographed. The other attendees saw them and we did not.


77 posted on 11/01/2011 10:15:38 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson