[Kevmo]

That’s kind of a lame example, citing from a fictional source to prove a factual point, and in the fiction it turned out to be true anyways.

If and when the customer is revealed, there won’t be any more seagulls to poop on these threads. Until then, it is going to be an exercise in inductive reasoning. And I’m thoroughly familiar with how inadequate the pathological skeptics are in that category.

[count-your-change]

Since there is obviously so much of these demos that is simply claims and hand waving you resort to insulting any one who isn't in awe of the magic boxes. Typical.

For all the scientific expertise apparently available to Rossie and Co. and yet they still can't set up even a simple demonstration properly? Please!

But you go on calling the non-believers “sea gulls”. It's as irrelevant as the the hype.