I’ll take your nonsensical reply as an admission by you that you know Rossi’s degree is fake, but you really don’t care.
You’re either on Rossi’s payroll, or lack essential critical thinking skills.
You’re either on Rossi’s payroll, or lack essential critical thinking skills.
***Let’s take a look at the critical thinking skills exhibited in this sentence, shall we? It exhibits a classic fallacy known as the False Dilemma. Now, how is it that someone criticising the critical thinking skills of another FReeper exhibits a classical logical fallacy which betrays a lack of the very critical thinking skills he is criticising? Irony, thy name is dinodino.
You’re either on Rossi’s payroll, or lack essential critical thinking skills.
***Let’s take a look at the critical thinking skills exhibited in this sentence, shall we? It exhibits a classic fallacy known as the False Dilemma. Now, how is it that someone criticising the critical thinking skills of another FReeper exhibits a classical logical fallacy which betrays a lack of the very critical thinking skills he is criticising? Irony, thy name is dinodino.
>> “I’ll take your nonsensical reply as an admission by you that you know Rossi’s degree is fake, but you really don’t care.” <<
.
You know that you’ve got them running when they resort to adhominem attack.
Rossi’s ‘degree’ is irrelevent. No degree ever produced anything. Degrees are for seeking employment or advancement. Rossi says that he has a process; why would you care whether he does or not? If his degree was from Stanford, would that make his process better?
Are you deeply concerned for the financial well being of his investor?
Tell us what your personal angle is.