Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon

I concur, the conquest of Gaul was popular because of the Gallic invasions of Italy, during one of which the Gauls sacked Rome. By Caesar’s time that was long of out living memory, but the Romans still remembered it. :’)

Caesar’s successors had to deal with occasional incursions, but mostly managed their frontiers through the discipline of the legions, a few long walls, and (mostly) stabilization of tribes and other groups just over their borders, iow, creation of buffer states.

One problem was the devastation of Gaul wrought by Caesar — as much as half of the Gallic population was displaced, and a significant fraction was carted off into slavery. The vacant lands were discussed and drooled over by tribes east of the Rhine. And that problem went on for centuries. It was finally resolved when the thin bronze line failed for good, and European populations familiar today started to enter and take root.


33 posted on 11/09/2011 7:24:42 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

What if...

The dissipated Roman state had been reinvigorated in a new center of Gallic/Germanic peoples further north.

Probably would have been something horrific but maybe not. At least the accumulated knowledge would have carried forward.


34 posted on 11/09/2011 7:42:56 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson