“Britons In USA In 6th Century - Shock Claim (Prince Madoc)”
Great link, but I’m puzzled...again.
Last I read, the “scholarly consensus” was that Arthur’s mere existence was unproven and doubtful. A legend incorporating elements of history with fiction, it was said.
Here there are flat assertions that Arthur I fought the Gauls, and there was an Arthur II who did this, that, and the other.
What happened?