Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: afraidfortherepublic
Here's the theory about why the artifacts were broken from the article (computers with access to Google can easily find it):

"In a practice in northern Europe dating from the Bronze Age through Anglo-Saxon times, swords and other objects, many conspicuously valuable, were deposited in bogs, rivers, and streams as well as in the ground.

"We can no longer see hoards only as piggy banks," says Kevin Leahy, an authority on Anglo-Saxon history who was entrusted with the task of cataloging the Staffordshire treasure. Ritual deposits, as opposed to caches buried for safekeeping, are found not only in Britain but also in Scandinavia, homeland of some of England's Germanic tribes.

Significantly, many weapons—and sometimes other objects, such as a craftsman's tools—were, like the objects in the hoard, bent or broken before burial. Perhaps "killing" a weapon dispatched it to the land of spirits or rendered it a votive offering to the gods, its destruction representing the donor's irrevocable surrender of the valuable weapon's use."

12 posted on 10/22/2011 8:55:34 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Bernard Marx

That is an interesting theory, but the objects pictured were not weapons; they were adornment. Well, maybe you could think of them as a woman’s, or a man’s, weapons, used to provoke envy in onlookers.


13 posted on 10/22/2011 9:14:57 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Bernard Marx

Well, sacrificing precious objects is more civilized than sacrificing virgins.


16 posted on 10/24/2011 12:30:02 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson