Prior to this there was existence, but so what? There was life, but who cares? With no one to consciously experience it, what was the point? Without self-conscious observers, the whole cosmos could bang into being and contract into nothingness, and it would be no different than the proverbial tree falling in the forest with no one there to hear it.
One of the reasons why this is such a lonely and unpopular blog is that it takes both science and religion seriously. Most science and religion are unserious, but especially -- one might say intrinsically -- when they exclude each other.
A religion that cannot encompass science is not worthy the name, while a science that cannot be reconciled with religion is not fit for human beings. And I mean this literally, in that it will be a science that applies to a different species, not the one that is made to know love, truth, beauty, existence, and the Absolute. Science must begin and end in this principle -- which is to say, the Principle -- or it is just a diversion. ...."
bttt
· Theodidactic Neotraditional Retrofuturism · Orthoparadoxical Nouspeak · Spontaneous Verticalisthenics · Immanental Gymgnostics · Logospheric Circumnavelgazing · Dilettantric Yoga · Freevangelical Pundamentalism · Absurcular Arguments · and · Omspun Jehovial Witticisms ·No wonder that post was such a mixture of ex cathedra and gibberish.