Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: factmart
Justice was done , no DNA.

DNA is not necessary to prove guilt

36 posted on 10/03/2011 1:11:29 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Azzurri

I think this sweet angels character was proven the moment she tried to send down an innocent man for murder and slander the police aswell.

Whole thing stinks.........is anyone really stupid enough to believe she knows nothing about this murder?

Please don’t make her out to have suffered some horrible injustice it is sickening.


41 posted on 10/03/2011 1:13:47 PM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Azzurri

“DNA is not necessary to prove guilt”

No, but fake (er, “mistaken”) DNA evidence was used to convict her the first time.


42 posted on 10/03/2011 1:14:00 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson