[Cardhu]

Those are PAINTINGS not photographs

I am pleased that you have explained that DJ - some people on here, no doubt, would not be aware of that.

NONE of those paintings are contemporary to Jesus.

You are telling me that the medieval painters were not contemporaries of Jesus. You will be telling me next that the earth is not flat, that witches do not the cause droughts, that the earth is not the center of the universe and that women are not the devil's spawn.

Have a care MacWOW.

[wagglebee]

You are telling me that the medieval painters were not contemporaries of Jesus. You will be telling me next that the earth is not flat, that witches do not the cause droughts, that the earth is not the center of the universe and that women are not the devil's spawn.

Hey troll why don't you try answering my earlier questions.

Let me get this straight, you believe (based on your interpretation of some old paintings) that either:

A. Jesus Christ was a homosexual.

B. St. John the Apostle was a homosexual.

or

C. St. John was a woman.

Is this correct? YES or NO

[DJ MacWoW]

Have a care MacWOW.

I'm not the one making ridiculous comments.

[Jim Robinson]

If you continue in this asinine vein you get the zot. Period.

If FR is not your cup of tea, just leave:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2627159/posts

[metmom]

You are telling me that the medieval painters were not contemporaries of Jesus. You will be telling me next that the earth is not flat, that witches do not the cause droughts, that the earth is not the center of the universe and that women are not the devil's spawn.

Are you telling us they ARE? (Just to clear things up here)

[P-Marlowe]

You are telling me that the medieval painters were not contemporaries of Jesus.

You are a troll or an idiot or both.

I vote both.

IBTZ, you Michael-Moore Moron.