Uh, I don't follow all of what you said, but I think the feudal stuff came from you, last night on this same thread. Because the way I read your stuff, you said we were getting our law from Saxony whatever, although I think you maybe picked the wrong Saxony.:
Plus, take my word, you don't want to irritate my BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq., because she is VERY smart, and absolutely verbally vicious and ruthless on law stuff. You saw what she did to poor Diogene's Lamp, above. And that was like a 5 minute job for her to read the stuff and dictate the notes to me on what to say. (Oh, I bet he is still having to sit on a pillow!!!)
2nd, I am going to assume neither you or your BFF have actually read the congressional testimony regarding S. Res. 511 because if either of you had, you would see that they plead that (in their opinion) the Constitution is not a static document but rather it is merely a guideline for general interpretations and for that reason alone, Obama was qualified. Now why would they even bring up Obama’s eligibility if there was no question as to his birth qualifications?
When one is ignorant of history, especially the history of the heritage & lineage of the Judea-Anglo-Saxons who founded this great nation, they are all to quick to make their own laws or support those that do.