No, you’re wrong.
Many people like me are going to vote Obama out.
Many people like you are going to continue barking up a tree with no result other than defeat after defeat after defeat.
As I said, if you want to win, then you need a winning strategy. Has your strategy provided even a single skirmish victory yet?
In terms of Rubio, I don’t have to vote for him if I don’t want to, and I really don’t want to, but why shouldn’t he be able to run? Why would you want to block him from even entering the gate?
If we, a free people, are incapable of determing with our vote who will be a good president and who will not, then we are doomed anyway, and none of this even matters.
We willingly voted in a fraudlent, marxist muslim as our president, and that is the root of our problem, not a judge failing to agree with a narrow definition of NBC designed to save us from our mistake.
We are the only ones who can save us, and before you ask, no, I didn’t vote for Obama.
Wars should be fought on many fronts. You only want one. We must fight across all options like the enemy(dems) otherwise we lose in the long run. It may only be a little bit at a time but in the end we will have nothing left but the chains.
‘a judge failing to agree with a narrow definition of NBC’
Well, narrow is one way to describe it. More importantly, it’s xenophobic and discriminatory. It treats foreign enemies of the Republic as second class citizens. They should have just as much right to father presidents as anybody else. The Founders knew this. They foresaw a time when we could become so bigoted we wouldn’t want half-foreigners to occupy the highest office of the land. To prevent us from discriminating against foreign enemies of the Republic, they enshrined in perpetuity their right to father the POTUS.
How else would a half-foreigner qualify to occupy the Oval Office and use it to fundamentally change the Republic? It all makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?