Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: brytlea

The biggest problem I have with Levin on this topic is that he really refuses to even address the issue. What is his opinion on the Constitutional definition of a ‘natural born citizen’? How does he come to such an opinion?

Am I wrong to say that Mark Levin has been avoiding this issue?

It is the same thing in regards to the Courts. They have really just been avoiding the issue thus leaving us very possibly with a future Constitutional crisis on our hands and the travesty of someone serving illegally as President.

As to your last point, McCain was challenged in this regard so I would suspect that this would of came up in regard to Rubio despite it coming up with Obama first. Let’s remember as well that this entire issue was raised by democrats in regards to Obama even. It was never started by conservative republicans but by Hillary supporters.


158 posted on 09/29/2011 11:42:25 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigIf

None of the conservative radio talk-show hosts can discuss this subject objectively. To do so will cost them their careers. They’ve all been threatened by the Obama Regime, a fact which has been covered extensively in other threads over the past four years.


164 posted on 09/29/2011 11:52:46 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: TheBigIf

I don’t really know about Levin (as I think I said I don’t listen to him). Maybe he doesn’t really have an answer, or maybe he’s spoken about it and doesn’t feel he needs to do it again?
At any rate, IF the court feels they have already set it to rest with Obama (and in the past with other Presidents) I simply don’t see how there is not already a precedent set.
However those who want that to be wrong will be along in a moment to call me stupid and evil or whatever. I WOULD like them to rule on it. I’m curious.
I don’t think that the biggest worry we have is whether or not Rubio could be President. I do think that if Obama were removed from office today over it, for instance it would be very damaging (yeah, I know I will get flack over saying that, but I really do believe that).
We are far better off to have an excellent candidate, elect him or her, and go about fixing the damage he has done. (and maybe having some civil discussions on FR. I’m not sure why we can’t do that anymore—and yes, I’m guilty too, I’m not sure why we’re all so angry these days—can we blame Obama?! :)


396 posted on 09/30/2011 9:13:24 AM PDT by brytlea (Wake me when it's over...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson