Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ADSUM
Voting for minor candidates may determine whether the Republican or Democrat wins.

And by how much.

Voting for a minor candidate can leave the Republicans with slim victory against an unpopular Democratic candidate, and make them realize (finally) that they're going to have to do something different.

Or will it take an outright loss to get their attention?

55 posted on 09/23/2011 7:52:31 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

A win is win and knowbody pays attention to a loser.

A loser can come back a be a winner (like Nixon).

Sending a message may give you a little influence, but not much.

You need to win, but you only have one vote. You need to work to get your candidate elected, but don’t take the football home if your candidate doesn’t win. Play the game with the best quarterback that the majority supports.

Liberals win because they stick together irrespective if their particular group is getting all they want.

Conservatives need to stick together. Conservatives have too many independent thinkers (that’s good) but each person want it their way and not willing to take small gains and work together for the greater good. The Tea Party is changing that, but they continue to need to convince others.
They have an influence, but they are not in control.

There are strenghts and weaknesses in each Republican candidate, but I will support the Republican nominee.

I hope we get a better nominee than Rommney, but he would be better than the alternative. I could see Rommney as a better President than Bush.


60 posted on 09/23/2011 9:37:30 AM PDT by ADSUM (Democracy works when citizens get involved and keep government honest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson