I think that is what is so funny. Politicians are, well, political. Romney clearly supported RomneyCare because he wanted to pander to his leftist state. Perry wanted to pander to the hispanic base in Texas. . .and you aren’t winning without doing so. This is actually why Obama fears Perry so much. Obama is counting on the hispanic vote to carry him to victory. Along comes Perry and suddenly Obama is facing losing a large chunk of that base.
Anyway, I digress, each of these two guys have political baggage and I can’t decide which is worse? ObamaCare/RomneyCarer or free education for Pedro. But I do know that smiling smooth Mitt is getting a free pass and it has to end, soon.
It is difficult to explain, yes. You can’t rule in a state that is 40% or 50% Hispanic by just taking a hardline on immigration. Arizona did it though.
Not so fast. I understand that you have to pander to Hispanics in Texas but not the whole United States. This will probably be the last election this will be true.
Perry didn’t have to veto the bill. All he had to do is not sign it and it would have become law anyway.
6.8% of the electorate is Hispanic (of which the majority is Caucasian). Of that 6.8%, 38% vote R.
In 2008, 125, 225,901 people voted.
8,515,361 were Hispanic and 3,235,837 voted R.
If McCain received all of the Hispanic vote he still would have lost by 3,259,035 votes.