Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU; Sherman Logan
Depends on what you mean by "modern." Throw in the Thirty Years' War and that thesis dies a quick death. The practice of burning entire villages in times of insurrection on the Continent never really fell out of practice. Armies both typically lived off the land and were quartered in civilian housing by force (often ejecting the owners), a practice that endured until Frederick William proved that the Prussian method of barracks and internal logistics was a superior method of keeping a field army intact and effective. The Brits were still doing it in America through the 18th century, which, I realize you're fully aware, is where the 3d Amendment came from.

A major complaint detailed in the Declaration of Independence had to do with warfare being waged on civilian populations through native proxies, a process that was waged the other direction with nearly equal deadliness. French, English and Spanish governments all tried that technique in one direction or another at one time or another.

As far as medicine goes, yes, to be wounded in battle during that time was often simply a slower way of dying due to wound sepsis, communicable diseases, and complications of the crude surgery of the day that sometimes took years to kill. Best of luck coming up with any epidemiological figures for that. Something a little worrisome is the assumption that any civil war fought today will be fought under conditions of modern medicine. It strikes me that dust-off flights, transfusions, antibiotics, et al, may come into short supply if we are unfortunate enough to have to go at it again. It would certainly be very, very ugly.

29 posted on 09/21/2011 2:19:52 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
It strikes me that dust-off flights, transfusions, antibiotics, et al, may come into short supply if we are unfortunate enough to have to go at it again.

I don't think many people realize how small our reserve medical capacity is. For us to have any significant such reserve, we'd have to have large buildings and many, many people waiting around for something bad to happen. Which we obviously don't.

At present additional capacity is added in disaster by bringing in out-of-area resources.

But what you do when all areas are affected?

34 posted on 09/21/2011 2:43:28 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson