Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mikey_1962; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; neverdem; SmithL; SunkenCiv; narses
You assume that my answer “supernovas” is the only answer.

Evidently I should have been more explicit: One source of Au is supernovas.

I'm going to (politely) disagree with you there: “Conventional” astrophysics only recognized supernova building of the elements (above the Fe and Ni isotopes) and stellar fusion->collapsing star->layered “burning” for isotopes past the 3-alpha carbon “bottleneck”. And each step of that stellar fusion and collapse adds millions (billions ?) of years to each lifetime of each isotope that is created. Making it less and less and less likely that the elements were actually formed that way.

On a one-by-one basis, the "conventional theory" is correct: It works in the mathematics, it works at the individual atomic level of each individual binding energy and each individual decay rate and fusion cross-section, it works in the laboratory as each individual particle accelerator results as a new isotopes are deposited on the collectors one by one. And all of those steps are (by themselves) correct: we can establish that atoms (isotopes) are built up that way. I've made atoms that way myself. I've burned atoms that way myself.

But.

There must be some other process where by all of the isotopes and atoms we know by measurement are present on earth have been built. Created. Formed. Fused up. Or fused up and eventually fissioned back down.

We just cannot build enough isotopes in the "conventional wisdom" way, then transport those finished gold atoms across space between the stars fast enough to get enough of them here inside earth's crust to make a single ounce of gold. Much less a single Holy Grail. 8<)

74 posted on 09/13/2011 9:04:09 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear Robert A. Cook, PE!


75 posted on 09/13/2011 11:31:14 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Robert A. Cook, PE.


Gold Price dot org


Gold Price dot org

76 posted on 09/13/2011 8:22:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

http://www.galmarley.com/framesets/fs_commodity_essentials_faqs.htm

Gold : prices, facts, figures & research

Commodity Numbers FAQs

How much gold is there?

In the world there are currently somewhere between 120,000 and 140,000 tonnes of gold ‘above ground’. To visualise this imagine a single solid gold cube with edges of about 19 metres (about three metres short of the length of a tennis court). That’s all that has ever been produced.

Divided amongst the population of the world there are about 23 grams per person, about 1.2 cubic centimetres each. This equates to about $250 - $350 worth per person on Earth, depending on the current price.


77 posted on 09/13/2011 8:22:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; Mikey_1962; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; neverdem; SmithL; SunkenCiv; narses
Thanks for your comment. I suggest that you check the recent literature on the r process and related subjects such as this
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-ref_query?bibcode=1999ApJ...525L.121F&refs=CITATIONS
It will answer many of your questions.
80 posted on 09/14/2011 12:53:41 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson