Skip to comments.
Human ancestors interbred with related species
Naturenews ^
| 09-05-2011
| Matt Kaplan
Posted on 09/08/2011 5:17:24 PM PDT by Renfield
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: Renfield
Perhaps one of you quasi-scientists could take a few moments and explain how it is in your world that out of millions of species over so long only man developed to our level?
If, our evolution was truly from animal state to the present human form...why have no other species shown similar development in intelligence, etc.? That has been puzzling me for some time now.
I believe that life evolves to some extent...but have never been convinced that present man evolved from animal primates...I know technically we are animal...but I think most will know what I mean.
41
posted on
09/08/2011 6:24:37 PM PDT
by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: Renfield
This thread is NOTHING without pictures....
The beauty herself. Let's call her Butterface....
To: Renfield
"The ability to discern complex models of demographic history with such a small data set, when many of the basic features of African genomes and history remain unknown, concerns me." Sometimes, models are created to support a theory.
43
posted on
09/08/2011 6:34:52 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: Squantos; smokingfrog
Hey, some of us like it ruff!
44
posted on
09/08/2011 6:41:15 PM PDT
by
Eaker
("If someone misquotes you, it's because they know you're right.")
To: Squantos; Eaker
LOL
I knew you’d come through with a belly laugh.
45
posted on
09/08/2011 6:56:08 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
To: Renfield
46
posted on
09/08/2011 6:59:20 PM PDT
by
Outrance
To: Claud
(Because there is foreign, non-homo sapiens material in the mtDNA now.) No doubt about it. I've seen the proof.
47
posted on
09/08/2011 6:59:24 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
Aren’t various homos still doing this ? Isn’t it anal sex that produces Democrats ?
48
posted on
09/08/2011 7:00:46 PM PDT
by
white17x
To: SonofReagan
Always get a laugh out of x wives names.....very creative...
To: laweeks
I think the “Navy” states it thusly: “Any port in a storm!”
50
posted on
09/08/2011 7:09:30 PM PDT
by
Tucker39
To: Renfield
51
posted on
09/08/2011 7:18:04 PM PDT
by
Oratam
To: Oratam
Dude, that’s him, that’s my last boss!
To: Renfield
Wait a minute! Wait a minute!
Should we all even being discussing this? I mean since we’re all apparently “anti-science” and all. lol
53
posted on
09/08/2011 7:26:32 PM PDT
by
MNnice
(Showing fresh signs of liberalitis, the strain of the orbital muscles due to excessive eye rolling)
To: Renfield
Our ancestors bred with other species in the Homo genus..."You see??? Pwoof!"
54
posted on
09/08/2011 7:28:30 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
To: laweeks
But don’t question the theory, er science. You’ll be called a knuckle dragging throwback. And that’s from the people who made their life’s work STUDYING knuckle dragging throwbacks.
55
posted on
09/08/2011 7:44:00 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Are now or have you ever been a member of the tea party is NOT a legitimate debate question.)
To: trumandogz; SunkenCiv; All
To: Renfield
Yes, and the inbreds become progressives...just saying.
To: PapaBear3625
If we could inter-breed with them, then they were not a different species, per the definition of species. They were just other races of Man.
Good point.
58
posted on
09/08/2011 8:25:37 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Nothing that offends God can possibly be a legitimate right.)
To: YHAOS; PoorMuttly
You mean to say that we are all mutts? ...and a muttly crew we are, too.
Ich bin ein Muttler!
59
posted on
09/08/2011 8:26:19 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
("Public service" does NOT mean servicing the people, like a bull among heifers.)
To: freejohn; smokingfrog; SunkenCiv; Renfield; blam; All
The two guys in the Comment you refer to might be members of two notorious families that were studied around the 1930s in the Appalacian Mts. This was a study of feeblemindedness cause by incest and inbreeding. The families were called the Jukes and the Kalikacks (sp?) if I remember correctly. Not to be confused with the Hatfields and the McCoys. My mother used to refer to them when we kids did something really stupid.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson