You are either a liar or have comprehension issues. Factual info is factual info whether it comes from FR or Walt Disney. You Tube has been the “Source” of many litigated cases so I think if the US courts consider it a legit ‘source’ of information in lawsuits, their definition is somewhat more credible than yours.
And don’t think we didn’t notice how you have steered the discussion away from Perry, his issues and your support of Illegals.
A US court would almost never allow anything from Youtube to be admitted as evidence in a case, both on the ground of unreliability as well as on the ground of hearsay.
BTW, who gave the following answers in an interview:
Q: Do you think they all should be deported?
A: There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant -there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants- not only economically is that just an impossibility but that's not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue that we face with illegal immigration.
Q: Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?
A: No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They've got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.
Q: To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
A: I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.
I'll give you a hint, it wasn't Perry.
