Well it does in some states but I'm not sure if you really want to test that little theory, bud. I have a feeling that a jury would still convict you because don't those statutes refer to the STEALING of property (especially at nighttime)? Obviously if some druggie is attempting to steal your car then the law gives you the right to shoot him (in some states), but if you just shoot some doper that accidentally takes a couple of steps on your lawn, then I think the law is going to come down on you pretty hard, especially if all the police find on him is a couple of condoms and a Phish concert ticket.
But back to the issue of ONE SENTENCE FITS ALL, no reason for dopers to miss out on all the gurney rides.
What does this even mean? I swear, we have seen some nutty stuff in this thread -- people advocating for the government to deliberately poison street drugs, and you talking about shooting dopers who accidentally take a step on your property. Tell me, muawiyah, would you shoot a drunk high school student who took a couple of steps on your property? What if he sat on the hood of your car with a beer and was drinking it? Capital offense worthy of execution in your book?
If we are going to use execution as the penalty for a whole host of crimes what principle would we use to limit the use?