[Longbow1969]

I disagree. I thought he asked good, hard questions.

I thought he was fine as well. The point of the primary and these debates is to vet these candidates. If anyone thinks Wallace is unfair or tough, wait till our eventual nominee is questioned by the MSM in the presidential debates - it'll get much worse.

So let Wallace ask the tough, and perhaps sometimes confrontational, questions now and see how our candidates respond. Let them deal with adversity and see how they handle with it.

[avital2]

i agree - Repubs need to deal with questions like this in primary season so the candidate is ready for election season. everyone knows where the press is coming from: it’s up to the candidate to learn how to handle this stuff.

[SumProVita]

You GOT it, Longbow. ;-)

[Sudetenland]

We are not in the Presidential race, we are in the primaries. We need the candidates to focus on solutions, not on fighting amongst themselves.

Chris Wallace's questions weren't aimed at informing the voters, they were solely intended to cause strife. There is plenty of time for candidates to prove themselves against the MSM, right now Republicans need information, not a cat fight. Leave the anger and hatred to the Democrats and focus on ideals. There will be plenty of time for hostile questions later.

[skeeter]

If anyone thinks Wallace is unfair or tough, wait till our eventual nominee is questioned by the MSM in the presidential debates - it'll get much worse.

SO what your saying is Wallace wasted the only opportunity we will probably have to hear what thesse guys have to say on substantive issues on a national stage.

Wallace did no one but Obama any favors.