Chris Wallace in the last year has gone over the edge to see whose is nuttier his againg Dad or Chris.
Chris is an UNMANNERLY TWIT who needs to be brought down a few pegs!!
“You embarrassed yourself, Chris.”
Yeah, recent interviews haven’t gone well for little Chris. He stepped in some poo poo when he interviewed Saraha Palin awhile back and he did the same with Michelle Bachman last night. Interesting that he only asks these provocative questions of women, and conservative women at that, isn’t it? Personally, I think Chrisy is outing his inner dislike of conservative women, especially intelligent and attractive conservative women. Time to quit sitting around eating all that soup Chris and go get some help....
Moreover, in this particular case, Wallace's question was completely valid -- if Newt cannot keep a campaign organization together, what is the evidence that he can build a team to run the Executive Branch?
I disagree. I thought he asked good, hard questions.
Yup, the majority of the questions to the candidates went like this:
FoxNews: “You once said_____ but in 2005 you________.
Gotcha questions!
Very few if any: “How would you deal with this situation___?
It was apparent he is a Ron Paul fan.
As much as most of us are not fans of Newt and know he is unelectable - we were all cheering his reply back to Wallace. It was a night of gotcha questions, and questions designed to have the candidates turn on each other, just as Newt said.
But Newt was correct, we wanted to hear their ideas for America not to watch them squirm trying to answer childish questions more suited to "The View" than a serious venue.
Not sure how long he can keep his Sunday prime spot acting like this. Brit Hume must be concerned.
In case anyone wants to see what the event in question:
Totally agree. It was a delight to see Newt eviscerate him.
In a televised political debate with liberal moderators, these kinds of 'gotcha!' questions are almost de rigueur so the candidates should be prepared for them but in this instance, I think Chris Wallace deserved Newt's rebuke. Of course, Newt Gingrich is known for his short fuse and aversion to criticism, another aspect of his personality that often obviates his intelligent approach to weighty matters of state. Newt might be a good candidate for a advisory position in a conservative Republican administration but as a presidential candidate, he is far back in the pack and likely to stay there. As for Chris Wallace, I'm sure he was asking what he thought were relevant questions and, in the process, grooming himself to be chosen to moderate a presidential debate after the GOP convention, when the Republican candidate has been chosen. That probably won't happen but for the candidates in Iowa last night, thanks to Chris Wallace, they got a taste of what to expect if any one of them should capture the Republican presidential nomination: hardball politics.
I don’t know why you people are surprised by this?
Wallace is limousine liberal and the son of the leftist Mike Wallace from 60 Minutes.
Do you really think he is Conservative or will treat Obama the same way?
Chris Wallace deserves that treatment from ALL the candidates. He’s a turd. Belongs on TMZ
Wallace, on the other hand, is a known quantity. He only surprises me when he acts like a journalist.
Needless to say, I'm not surprised very often.
I sent in a nasty gram to F&F. I asked if Media Matters was blackmailing him.
Bunch of self-aggrandizing stiffs with no command of the English language and no real vision for the future. I did this and I did that and I did the other thing. None of which has made a hill of beans of difference. Except for Herman Cain. At least he can point to some actual accomplishments.
But, still, I'd take any one of them over Urkel.
Even Ron Paul. Oh, crap. Did I really say that? The world is over.
Why isn’t this in Breaking News?????