Let's skip your self-important thoughts about the Dharma and cut right to the bottom line. I made one post to you, making no judgments at all, and you accused me of acting above everyone. "Not everyone can enjoy your level of cinta prajna, noble master." While you have posted at least a dozen times lauding your high standards of aesthetic appreciation of women's appearance. Which has nothing at all to do with behavior.
Now who is the one acting like a holier-than-though self-righteous prig? LOL
I made one post to you, making no judgments at allLet's review, shall we?
I suspect you look like Helen Thomas warmed over.
Can we characterize that statement as eirenic?
And putting that aside, are we now agreed that cinta prajna is accurately described as a Buddhist concept?