Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86
Your transcript quote does not mean climbing/descending confusion to me. The first question was about the altitude itself, not rate-of-change (remember, the plane was required to maintain a specific altitude). The second question might have been trying to distinguish between pressure altitude on the altimeter and GPS altitude from satellites, that's not clear. The third sentence shows they knew they were descending.

The ground speed given by GPS differs from the airspeed, due to the winds, and these can be very strong up there at 35,000. However, it might have provided some rough guidance if they had any decent wx info on winds at their altitude.

100 posted on 07/31/2011 2:17:14 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: expatpat
He clearly suspected he was descending but wasn't positive. I agree that raw GPS ground speed would be minimally helpful while airborne, but one would think that computerized tracking of course/track/heading would apply a correction to that (if the systems were working). And experienced pilots would acquire an ability to apply a mental correction to even the raw GPS speed (I realize that circumstances were not conducive to leisurely contemplation of these possibilities).
102 posted on 07/31/2011 2:31:45 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson