[mountainlion]

There seems to be many mistakes and outright fraud in the theories of evolution. Nebraska man comes to mind. Peking man has been missing for along time. Neanderthal man theories are as common as global warming theories.

[raygunfan]

Captain Obvious, please pick up the white courtesy phone in the lobby, thank you.

[Berlin_Freeper]

embarrassing

[allmendream]

It was A transitional form between dinosaurs and birds - a feathered flying dinosaur.

It may not have been THE transitional form that eventually evolved into birds, but rather an offshoot that went extinct.

So how does a feathered flying dinosaur disprove evolution through natural selection of genetic variation again?

It doesn’t.

It is the same “look science changes what it believes based upon evidence, while we still believe the same thing despite all evidence.” creationist canard.

[skeptoid]

Denton was right in 1986.

. . . ."a theory in crisis" indeed.

[faucetman]

“Answers in Genesis “

In depth lecture series on evolution, creation, archeology, and many many topics. The information is there for anyone who wants to be informed. Christian Scientists (not the religious sect), but actual scientists, go as deep as you can handle. Not for the sound bite crowd. That is if you actually want to know the TRUTH.

for starters.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/media/video/ondemand

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

http://creationmuseum.org/

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/daily-articles

[RFEngineer]

I’m more stunned by this:

“The discovery, called Xiaotingia zhengi, was found in western Liaoning, China, in rocks dating to the Jurassic time frame, an assumed 161 million to 145 million years ago.”

So are the creationists admitting that the earth is older than 6,000 years and scientific methods such as Carbon-14 dating are valid?

If Creationists can accept this, we have true evidence of evolution.