So, S. 1194 runs counter to Printz. v. United States? Funny how these potentates on the Judiciary Committee always demand fidelity to precedent from Supreme Court nominees but have no troubling designing bills that violate that same Court precedent.
First open borders, now courts without borders.
Successive challenges to convictions and sentences. Great. Meanwhile, as the courts back up on those cases, other criminals are on the streets. Anyone put thought into how much money this would cost to staff up the courts and prisons?